Evaluation of Dentifrice Containing Nano-hydroxyapatite for Dentinal Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published In: Journal of International Oral Health
Publication Year: 2015
Study Design
This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial, conducted over four weeks at a single dental center in Chennai, India.
Funding Sources
The article lists no specific funding and states no conflicts of interest.
PICO Framework – what was studied and how?
Population:
Adults aged 18–60 years with a history of dentin hypersensitivity to thermal or sour stimuli, with no periodontal therapy in the past year.
Intervention:
Use of a dentifrice containing nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HAP).
Comparison:
Use of a dentifrice containing 5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate (NovaMin), a standard desensitizing agent.
Outcomes:
Reduction in dentinal hypersensitivity, measured via Visual Analog Scale (VAS) using three stimuli: tactile test, air blast, and cold water application.
In Paragraph Form:
This randomized controlled trial examined whether a nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste could reduce dentinal hypersensitivity more effectively than a standard toothpaste containing NovaMin. The population included adults with known sensitivity, and outcomes were measured via validated tests that simulate real-world triggers of hypersensitivity, with responses scored using a visual analog scale.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
History of hypersensitivity to hot, cold, or sour stimuli
-
No periodontal therapy in the past year
-
Willingness to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Active caries, attrited or chipped teeth
-
Recent use of anti-inflammatory/analgesic medication
-
Recent periodontal surgery (within 6 months)
-
Presence of dentures or bridges interfering with evaluation
-
Pregnancy or lactation
Demographics and Study Design
-
Total participants: 36 (20 males, 16 females)
-
Groups:
-
18 subjects used the nano-HAP dentifrice
-
18 subjects used the NovaMin dentifrice
-
All participants brushed twice daily for 4 weeks using the assigned dentifrice with a standard toothbrush.
Primary Outcome Variables and Results
Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain) across three tests: cold, air blast, and tactile.
Within-Group Sensitivity Reduction (After 4 Weeks)
| Test | Nano-HAP Mean Δ | NovaMin Mean Δ | p-value (both: baseline vs 4 weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cold Test | 1.77 (p = 0.003) | 2.11 (p = 0.006) | Significant |
| Air Blast | 1.50 (p < 0.001) | 2.05 (p = 0.004) | Significant |
| Tactile | 0.88 (p = 0.004) | 0.94 (p = 0.020) | Significant |
Between-Group Comparisons
| Test | p-value (Nano-HAP vs NovaMin) |
|---|---|
| Cold Test | 0.869 |
| Air Blast | 0.404 |
| Tactile Test | 0.386 |
➡️ No statistically significant difference was found between the two products.
Conclusions
Both nano-hydroxyapatite and NovaMin toothpastes showed significant reductions in dentinal hypersensitivity over a 4-week period. The nano-HAP formulation was equally effective as the benchmark NovaMin-containing toothpaste, suggesting it can be a viable alternative for managing sensitivity symptoms.
Discussion: Strengths and Limitations
Strengths:
-
Double-blind design minimized bias.
-
Used three distinct sensitivity measures for robust assessment.
-
Incorporated validated pain measurement (VAS).
-
Well-aligned with clinical guidelines and ADA recommendations.
Limitations:
-
Small sample size (n=36).
-
Short duration (4 weeks); long-term effects unknown.
-
Conducted at a single center, limiting generalizability.
-
Specific toothpaste brands were de-identified during testing, but from a scientific reproducibility standpoint, this limits formulation transparency.
Despite these limitations, the study provides important early clinical evidence supporting nano-hydroxyapatite's use in sensitivity management.
Citation
Nithin G, John J, Nagappan N, Prabhu S, Senthilkumar E. Evaluation of dentifrice containing nano-hydroxyapatite for dentinal hypersensitivity: A randomized controlled trial. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(8):118–122.
🔗 PubMed Link
Visual Aid
Table: Sensitivity Score Reduction After 4 Weeks (VAS Scores)
| Test | NovaMin (Δ Score) | Nano-HAP (Δ Score) | Significance (p-value) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cold Water | 2.11 | 1.77 | NS (p = 0.869) |
| Air Blast | 2.05 | 1.50 | NS (p = 0.404) |
| Tactile | 0.94 | 0.88 | NS (p = 0.386) |
Note: "NS" indicates not statistically significant between groups.
